On Mon, Jun 15, 2015 at 7:37 PM, Steven Haddock <[email protected]> wrote:
> This was a timely post by Maxime, because I was just thinking of surveying 
> instructors about what they use for their own work and what were the thoughts 
> about porting SWC lessons to Python 3. I can’t remember if there was a recent 
> thread on this…
> Worth creating an issue (or something even more formal) and having people 
> state their cases?
>
> We are using Python 3 for the next edition of our book, but I feel a bit like 
> the first guy over the wall at the Battle of Hastings, looking over my 
> shoulder at the other 85% huddled in relative safety

It was about a year ago that I `ln -s -f /usr/local/bin/python3.4
/usr/local/bin/python`, and I haven't looked back since.  Getting used
to print() took a little while, and I found a tiny handful of holdout
libraries that I needed to convert to Python 3.  But it's been smooth
sailing for a long time now, and it's just loathesome when I have to
go back to Python 2 to fix something that worked fine in Python 3.

I admit not everyone is in a position to do that.  Just my experience.

Erik

>> On Jun 15, 2015, at 12:17 , Maxime Boissonneault 
>> <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>> Some interresting reading :
>>
>> http://astrofrog.github.io/blog/2015/05/09/2015-survey-results/
>>
>> Maxime
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Discuss mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.software-carpentry.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss_lists.software-carpentry.org

_______________________________________________
Discuss mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.software-carpentry.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss_lists.software-carpentry.org

Reply via email to