As is this paper:

http://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/article?id=10.1371/journal.pcbi.1002598


On Thu, Sep 3, 2015 at 2:30 PM, Juan Nunez-Iglesias <[email protected]>
wrote:

> I'm currently too swamped to contribute, but if someone is interested,
> this blog post by Jake Vanderplas is a great resource for information about
> scientific software licensing:
>
>
> http://www.astrobetter.com/blog/2014/03/10/the-whys-and-hows-of-licensing-scientific-code/
>
> Good luck!
>
> On Thu, Sep 3, 2015 at 6:04 PM Greg Wilson <
> [email protected]> wrote:
>
>> Hi David,
>>
>> Thanks for this - you're right, we should have included licenses in the
>> "Best Practices" paper, and we should talk about the "why" of licensing in
>> the novice Git lesson.  Would you (or anyone else) like to take a crack at
>> doing that?
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Greg
>>
>>
>> On 2015-09-03 4:59 PM, David LeBauer wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> Yesterday I downloaded some great software but couldn't find a
>> license. Notably, the link from the original publication had since broken,
>> but I could find a page with a .zip download of the source code via google.
>>
>>
>> However, I did not find any license file, only a request for citation in
>> the user manual. I emailed the author about conditions for reuse, and she
>> replied "All we ask is that the original work is cited and the URL of
>> distribution is specified in any product that comes out of its use."
>>
>> I wanted to suggest that they adopt some best practices to facilitate
>> reuse - add a license file, port the code to github, and assign a doi -
>> even offer to do it.
>>
>> But I also wanted to justify the value of adding a license. I thought it
>> was in the the lesson on open science, but could not find [1] it there -
>>  the section on licenses begins "The first question is licensing. Broadly
>> speaking, there are two kinds of open license ..." [2] I also don't see*
>> any discussion of licenses in Wilson et al 2014 best practices for
>> scientific computing [3].
>>
>> I was pretty sure there are some principled motivations, such as a
>> license makes it easy for users to know and respect the author's wishes.
>> I'd add them to the lesson, but would appreciate if I missed the section or
>> if anyone had any suggestions.
>>
>> Thanks in advance,
>>
>> David
>>
>> [1] by "find", I mean, can't find matches to my search string
>> [2] https://software-carpentry.org/v5/novice/git/04-open.html.
>> [3]
>> http://journals.plos.org/plosbiology/article?id=10.1371/journal.pbio.1001745
>>
>>
>> --
>> David LeBauer, PhD
>> Research Scientist, Carl Woese Institute for Genomic Biology
>> Fellow, National Center for Supercomputing Applications
>> University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign
>> 1206 W. Gregory Drive
>> Urbana, IL  61801, U.S.A.
>> office: 217-300-0266
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Discuss mailing 
>> [email protected]http://lists.software-carpentry.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss_lists.software-carpentry.org
>>
>>
>> --
>> Dr. Greg Wilson    | [email protected]
>> Software Carpentry | http://software-carpentry.org
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Discuss mailing list
>> [email protected]
>>
>> http://lists.software-carpentry.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss_lists.software-carpentry.org
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Discuss mailing list
> [email protected]
>
> http://lists.software-carpentry.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss_lists.software-carpentry.org
>



-- 
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
[email protected]
@kcranstn
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
_______________________________________________
Discuss mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.software-carpentry.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss_lists.software-carpentry.org

Reply via email to