Dear all, I'm with Jason and others who have replied, here. I expected to be able to vote for > 1 candidates (like last time), and was a bit frustrated from this limitation - there is probably no single best candidate anyway, and I feel unable to make a balanced contribution.
Best wishes, Laurent On 15 February 2016 11:04, Williams, Jason wrote: > Honest to goodness question, > > Maybe I missed this but is there a reason we didn't use the same style > of voting used last year? Choosing only one candidate makes it > impossible to think about choosing a committee that is balanced. Since > we are voting for a group (not only one person/position) I really > liked that. > > I guess it all turns out in the end, but raising the point in case > anyone else may have even better reasons to agree/disagree with me. > > Happy voting! > > - Jason > _______________________________________________ > Discuss mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.software-carpentry.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss_lists.software-carpentry.org _______________________________________________ Discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.software-carpentry.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss_lists.software-carpentry.org
