On Mon, Feb 15, 2016 at 11:14:58AM +0000, Neil Chue Hong (SSI) wrote: > Alternatively, I'm a big fan of transferable vote systems.
I'm not sure how tightly you mean “transferable vote” (do you mean [1]? [2]?). My personal preference is the Shulze method [3], and there's a bit of discussion about it in [4]. Cornell hosts a web-based implementation for various Condorcet flavors [5]. Cheers, Trevor [1]: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Single_transferable_vote [2]: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Proportional_representation [3]: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Condorcet_method [4]: https://github.com/swcarpentry/board/issues/3 [5]: http://civs.cs.cornell.edu/ -- This email may be signed or encrypted with GnuPG (http://www.gnupg.org). For more information, see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pretty_Good_Privacy
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ Discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.software-carpentry.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss_lists.software-carpentry.org
