Might I politely suggest that given that this has shifted quite far from
the merits of teaching SWC/DC to high school students to a broader
discussion of the normative conventions of e-mail list etiquette and the
overall validity of the code of conduct we close out this thread and then
open it up as a new thread.  Many who might wish to comment on this have
probably missed out due to the misdirection of the title.  Just a thought.

On Thu, May 5, 2016 at 8:32 AM Matthew Brett <matthew.br...@gmail.com>
wrote:

> Hi,
>
> On Thu, May 5, 2016 at 11:23 AM, Spaced Girl
> <alittlemonsteruniversi...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > How about SC just do away with the whole code of conduct in general?
> It's a
> > theoretical piece of shit and has no practical value. I say this
> especially
> > after all the arguing that's transpired over the past 24 hours and my
> > general disgust with some of the posting of instructors here...[very few
> on
> > the planet but me would notice or care].
> >
> > Overall, think going gentler on students/new individuals anywhere is the
> > only acceptable approach to teaching/living. The problem with things like
> > codes of conduct or talk of politeness or respect is how couched in
> highly
> > normative/exclusive/dominant social ideas they are.
> >
> > From what I've noticed; this is a very diverse group compared to most
> > academic related places and makes for all sorts of alien talk. Learning
> to
> > fight/discuss through our differences in a much more productive approach
> > than going fascist on everything....even if this is a company
> [authoritative
> > space].
>
> Er ... I tend to agree with you about the code of conduct and I
> strongly agree that allowing space for vigorous discussion is
> essential.
>
> I would say though, that it appears that the "code of conduct" issue
> has become extremely sensitive, with very strong feelings from all
> sides.
>
> So, in order to avoid pressing buttons, I was hoping to divert away
> from whether the CoC is good or not, to writing another document that
> everyone can agree on, that states in simple language what kind of
> community we'd like to see, in positive rather than negative terms.
> Maybe then we wouldn't have to fight about the CoC.
>
> Cheers,
>
> Matthew
>
> _______________________________________________
> Discuss mailing list
> Discuss@lists.software-carpentry.org
>
> http://lists.software-carpentry.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss_lists.software-carpentry.org
>
_______________________________________________
Discuss mailing list
Discuss@lists.software-carpentry.org
http://lists.software-carpentry.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss_lists.software-carpentry.org

Reply via email to