Hi all, I have not realised the attachments have been removed. The paper I mentioned is: "Designing a Rubric for Feedback on Code Quality in Programming Courses" https://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=2999555
unfortunately not open access, behind the paywall. best, Mateusz On 10 April 2017 at 22:42:14, Mateusz Kuzak ([email protected]) wrote: Hi Sumana, Thank you for sharing this. I think you may find interesting a paper about designing a rubric for code review (and a rubric itself, attaching both). Good luck with the workshop and I hope you will tell us how it went. best, Mateusz On 10 April 2017 at 22:31:17, Sumana Harihareswara ([email protected]) wrote: Summary: links to training materials teaching people how to review code? I'm working on an in-person training workshop to teach developers in an open source project how to review code. Specifically, my goal is to get these developers more comfortable performing nonbinding code review, so that 3 months after the training, at least half of them are consistently reviewing others’ pull requests. I am attempting to design this instruction in accordance with Software Carpentry standards. Of course some of the training's going to be specific to the project we're working on, but I'd love any other example training materials from other communities or courses. The start of a draft for my workshop (I need to do a concept map and then rework this): https://paper.dropbox.com/doc/PyCon-sprint-Code-review-training-jCLQtc4G3O0z93bLGV56g examples of some past trainings I've led: https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Code_review_management/July_2011_training and https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Code_review_management/Aug_2011_training -- Sumana Harihareswara Changeset Consulting http://changeset.nyc _______________________________________________ Discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.software-carpentry.org/listinfo/discuss
_______________________________________________ Discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.software-carpentry.org/listinfo/discuss
