We were asked to do something similar in a recent Scientific Teaching 
workshop, but copying a line of text a letter at a time instead of 
reciting the alphabet, which I think overcomes one of Henry's concerns.

I share his other concern though: if I ignore my e-mail for too long 
then I'm not doing my job. An exercise like this can be valuable for 
getting across the perils of multi-tasking, though, without telling 
people how to manage their time. We all make compromises, but it's 
better to make them consciously.

Cheers
Ben


On 02/10/17 09:37, Leighton Pritchard wrote:
> 
>> On 2 Oct 2017, at 01:39, Henry Neeman <[email protected] 
>> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
>>
>> Not wanting to be a downer, but ....
>>
>> I'm inclined to agree with David Wees, who
>> left the following comment on that page:
>>
>> "Is this a separate effect or is this
>> explainable with the way the memory of
>> A, B, C, ... and 1, 2, 3, ... are arranged
>> in memory?
>>
>> I know many people who need to recite the
>> entire alphabet, sometimes with a little
>> song, in order to remember that N goes after
>> M. And my five year old son still needs to
>> recite the entire list of counting numbers to
>> recall that 15 is after 14.
>>
>> So does this experiment measure the cost of
>> switching tasks or is it measuring something
>> else?"
> 
> Maybe one way to test that would be to have the students run backwards 
> through the alphabet, and count down from 26, then combine the 
> activities, and see if the effect persists?
> 
> Or, to eliminate memory effects in either direction, have them draw - 
> say - 10 squares on one piece of paper, and 10 triangles on another, 
> then attempt to alternate between squares and triangles (on different 
> pieces of paper) as the combined task? This should be more ‘obviously’ 
> slower as there is physical movement between the paper, so it would be 
> harder to distinguish between the mental switching and physical 
> switching cost, I suppose. Not that physical switching is entirely 
> irrelevant for distraction, mind.
> 
> L.
> 
> -- 
> Leighton Pritchard
> [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
> gpg/pgp:0xDECACFFC
> 
> 
> 
_______________________________________________
Discuss mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.software-carpentry.org/listinfo/discuss

Reply via email to