[email protected] wrote: > > I agree that in many cases NAT is used inappropriatly, but until IP > address space really is allocated to the end user (or company) rather than > the ISP, some of these arguments will remain as valid (or invalid) as they > are today (specificly the argument that it's easier to change ISPs if you > use NAT than if you use real IP addresses on your servers) >
This is a good point. I believe anybody can get a IPv6 block, but, the issue is to get it routed by an ISP, and unfortunately, in a lot of places, there aren't many ISPs, so competition isn't working the way it should. I can definitely see this as a problem... -- Yves. http://www.SollerS.ca/ _______________________________________________ Discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lopsa.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/discuss This list provided by the League of Professional System Administrators http://lopsa.org/
