Hi Gabriel,

I doubted very much that you agreed with me, but you did come across as understanding. I understand the points you've made below, and also disagree with them. I've found it best, whenever possible, to conduct my discussions on public lists and forums, in the same way I would conduct them from a professional standpoint. When you have a business, it is a little like being a celebrity. You're always in the public eye. I've seen other game developers get into trouble in the past specificly because they chose to be less professional on lists. Whether you agree with it or not, your personal behavior is linked to your company's name, and that will effect the way your company is viewed. That is just the way it goes when you have your own business.

In any case, I suggest we let this drop for the time being and I appreciate that you have been polite and cordial through this discussion. I expressed my concerns and never meant for this to become as big a problem as it has. Thanks again, and take care.



At 10:56 PM 7/15/2006, you wrote:

Josh:

I believe you are misunderstanding "when I said that I was
understanding your message"  which is different from "agreeing with
your message".

In all honesty, I agree with Bruce here that it is not productive to
anyone on this list   to misconceive my exibited behavior on gaming
lists annd other situations to where you mmight think you know me.

In reality, when I am working, as an AT Trainer for the state of
arizona or private companies or individuals, I in no way shape or
form, conduct myself as you seem to think I do on the email lists or
other nonprofessional situations.

As a matter of fact Josh, blindtechs.net is a company website for the
Registered company I own here in Arizona. I in no way shape or form
relate any of my personal life to my company, such as any business
owner shouldn't.

therfore, I ask that you maybe seperate the person you think you know
on lists, from the professional IT/AT person named Gabe Vega.

Thanks
Gabe Vega
The BlindTechs Network
(866)714-4244
http://blindtechs.net,
On Jul 15, 2006, at 10:39 PM, Josh de Lioncourt wrote:

Larry and all,

I'd ask that you please reference the other messages on this thread
from both myself clarifying my position and others who have offered
up extremely good insights on the situation.

I find it rather ironic that Gabe himself knew and understood my
comments, but others have been rather defensive on his behalf.  I
somewhat regret having tried to be so tactful in my initial
posting, as it has caused some confusion.

At 10:10 PM 7/15/2006, you wrote:

   You said, > A project like this, IMO, should be hosted by
someone supportive
of Mac or at least indifferent, but someone who also can deal with
Mac's critics with a
level head.

So, what you've said in your entire message is that you have a
personal problem with Gabe and that you are unhappy that Gabe has
taken it upon himself and invested both time and resources to get
this wickie off the ground.  Believe me when I say that I think
Gabe is level headed when dealing with people who are critical of
the Mac.  I can attest to the fact that when I first got my iMac
back in December of 2005 that Gabe constructively worked with me
to get me to a point where I purchased and now love my Mac.
Meanwhile, as I learned I posted critical comments of VO
functionality, Apple tech support (Reference my December messages
about Apple wanting to charge me $200 for VO support), and in so
posting these message got all sorts of flack and almost criticisms
from less than level headed people who were convinced that the Mac
was the latest and greatest thing since sliced bread.  I'm happy
to go dig up those responses I got if it helps refresh some
memories.  So, before we start slandering anyone on this list
remember that many people get over zealous and excited about the
Mac and for good reason.  But, t as some might say, take a pill
and cool it!






Visit my home page at http://www.disabilitynation.net and
subscribe to The DisabilityNation Podcast.
----- Original Message ----- From: "Access Curmudgeon"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "General discussions on all topics relating to the use of Mac
OS X by theblind" <[email protected]>
Sent: Saturday, July 15, 2006 4:56 PM
Subject: Re: Re: wiki has been created and is now hosted


I appreciate what you're trying to do here, Gabriel,

Yes, kudos to Gabe for setting us up.

but I'd like to advocate for the Screenless Switchers proposal

Yes, sounds nice, but, at least for indefinite future, it is just a
proposal.  Gabe has put his money where his mouth is.

for a number of reasons.

Okay.

 I think we need something a bit more centralized.

I do not follow.  The BlindTechs.Net wiki is wide open.  One doesn't
even need to register to edit.  One arbitrary domain is as good as
another isn't it?  Unless you get Apple or some already established
organization to sponsor the VO wiki.

I also have some concerns about the fact that we are already facing
a bit of an uphill battle with VO and Mac,

A working wiki should help with that.

and there are many in the VI community who do not have a
positive attitude toward you, Gabriel.

Ah, now we get to the matter.  You would deny Gabe this
opportunity to
redeem himself?  He is offering something up, rather unselfishly it
seems to me.  How is it not in the same spirit that Saqib sponsored
MacVisionaries?

I've not bumped into you for many years, so am reserving
judgment for now,

It sounds to me like you have already judged and condemned the
effort.

though some of your recent messages to this list
have not comforted me that you can keep neutrality.

Can you cite some rants or other controversial bits on the
BlindTechs.net domain which should make us worried?

A project like this, IMO, should be hosted by someone supportive
of Mac or at least indifferent,

There has been the vacuum for over a year.  No one has stepped up to
the plate until now.  I think we should be quite grateful.

but someone who also can deal with Mac's critics with a
level head.

I fail to comprehend why a volunteer wiki site needs to be
administered by someone with a spotless public relations reputation.

I bring this up in the spirit of furthering the use of Macs among
the blind, and none of this is intended as a personal attack.

I and relieved Gabe was not insulted.  I am inclined to reward those
who do the work rather than those who are polite and kind and but
not
actually useful.  I suppose the world needs both types.

I would really like to see this project move forward,

Okays, write a wiki article or two!  I wrote three new ones today.

and awareness and use of VO extended, but we need to consider
all these things.

I am sure you have the best intentions.  We need more than
intentions.
I also recognize  that, since I have drawn more than my fair
share of
criticism, I can empathize with Gabe more than most.

If people put just a quarter of the effort into the wiki as they are
willing to spend posting to MacVisionaries, the Wiki will come
together amazing quickly.

Unlike the listserv archives, it is reasonable to expect that the VO
wiki can actually be easy to find stuff in.  I hate to admit it, but
spelling and grammar can all be corrected after the fact as the site
evolves.







--
No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
Version: 7.1.394 / Virus Database: 268.10.1/389 - Release Date:
7/14/2006



"The rich declare themselves poor
"But most of us are not sure
"If we have too much, but we'll take our chances
"'cause God stopped keeping score..."
        Praying for Time -- George Michael


--
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
Version: 7.1.394 / Virus Database: 268.10.1/389 - Release Date:
7/14/2006









--
No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
Version: 7.1.394 / Virus Database: 268.10.1/389 - Release Date: 7/14/2006



"The rich declare themselves poor
"But most of us are not sure
"If we have too much, but we'll take our chances
"'cause God stopped keeping score..."
        Praying for Time -- George Michael


--
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
Version: 7.1.394 / Virus Database: 268.10.1/389 - Release Date: 7/14/2006



Reply via email to