Hey you make a good point so here's your chance to perhaps contact Apple and let them know. If it were an option, well, but yeah, its not really necessary and I have to agree. The NLS talking book readers didn't even do this.

Scott
[EMAIL PROTECTED]



On Aug 9, 2006, at 5:55 PM, Travis Siegel wrote:

Even if they do have other plans for Alex, and I'm sure they do, I can tell you nothing irritates me more when listening to a book than to hear the narrator breathing. This includes the quick breaths between sentences. The really good ones don't do this, and in my opinion, it makes the listening experience worlds better. I actually had to can one book because the reader not only kept taking breaths, but was talking with so much breath, it sounded like they were trying to seduce you with every line of dialog, and it wasn't a romance book. While I don't like the breathing, it is possible to ignore it to a point, but after a while if it continues, it just becomes too irritating for me. I much prefer the readers who work breathing into the pauses between sentences and paragraphs such that I can't hear them, or perhaps the microphone doesn't pick them up. This for me is by far more preferrable. But again, I understand why they're including that, to make it sound more natural, but as I said, in my opinion, it's distracting and wholely unnecessary. So, there's my two cents worth, for what it's worth to anyone who cares. Just figured I'd toss out my take on the matter, since I've been listening to recorded books for more than 30 years. Again, not that that means anything, only my personal view.


Reply via email to