Well, I took your original comment as a comparison of Apple's commitment to accessibility vs that of Microsoft's. That I think is on topic for the reason I mentioned; I think Apple can regain some market share in education via it's accessibility products, specifically voiceover.

I do think you're being unfair to Microsoft though.


------ Original Message ----- From: "David Poehlman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "General discussions on all topics relating to the use of Mac OS X by theblind" <[email protected]>
Sent: Thursday, September 07, 2006 9:27 AM
Subject: Re: Accessibility look at Vista


This is so off topic I won't go into it after this. The cause of what Microsoft has or has not done does not matter. The fact is that there are still manythings we cannot do with windows and windows does not have a fully accessible built in solution. I'm not saying that Mac OS iis perfect, I am saying however that when Microsoft says "accessible" it means something far different than it is often taken to mean.





Reply via email to