The iPhone does have a couple of traditional buttons on it, so
presumably they will hard code into the phone that to press and hold one
of these, or a combination of them, will dial 911. That is a simple and
logical sollution, and i don't know why other manufacturers wouldn't
have done that with the rejected phones you mentioned. Some phones
already come with a 911 function built in now, so this isn't a stretch
at all.
Greg Kearney wrote:
In doing some research into this matter I have found two
regulations/laws that may have a bearing on the iPhone. I want to
stress that we DO NOT KNOW if the iPhone is inaccessible or not. So
let's assume that it isn't for now.
First is the Telecommunication Act. This would seem to require Apple
to produce a phone that is accessible. The act give an out if it is
not readily able to do so. However given that the phone run OSX by
Apple's own admission then it would be hard to argue that it is not
readily about to make the phone accessible. The other option the act
provided is that the maker, Apple, could provide another accessible
model. No good in this case as this is the only model offered.
The second and perhaps far more serious issue is one of FCC approval.
The FCC has never approved a screen only phone and there have been
several attempts to get one approved. The reason for not approving
them has nothing to do with accessibility it has to do with safety.
They were rejected because in the case of an accident where the screen
was broken the phone would be unable to dial 911. It will be
interesting to see how Apple deals with this issue.
The last issue would not matter what Apple claims the iPhone to be. I
think it a ridiculous argument that the Telecommunication Act would
not apply because the iPhone isn't in fact a phone. I mean they call
it the iPhone after all.
Greg Kearney
- Re: New phone / accessibility issues Josh de Lioncourt
-