I could be wrong, but I believe the info button to change settings on
widgets is part of the widget interface, and not the HTML. Even so,
Apple then needs to make sure that the widgets it sends with OS/X are
properly tagged. Again, I don't believe that's the case with this.
That is true for the general functionality of the widgets though, and
I find many of them very useful even so.
Josh de Lioncourt
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
...my other mail provider is an owl...
On Apr 23, 2007, at 12:09 PM, Gabe Vega wrote:
but josh, the thing you forget is being that widgets are virtually
mini webpages with neat little tricks built in, all the
accessability is in the html tags, such as tagging images, buttons
etc. so its the hole battle again, apple or voice over cann't do
anything but say "Hey make sure to tag your widgetsso we're stuck
still.
On Apr 23, 2007, at 11:56 AM, Josh de Lioncourt wrote:
The problem with an approach like this, where regards widgets, is
that there are hundreds of widgets out there available to run on
your Mac. While it might be nice to write scripts that let you
change select settings for the most popular, we really need access
to the interface for them all. Scripting for full-blown
applications is far more reasonable, IMO, than for widgets.
Josh de Lioncourt
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
...my other mail provider is an owl...
On Apr 23, 2007, at 6:22 AM, .dan. wrote:
This is an example of what I asked a couple of days ago but there
were no
responses. Has anyone tried to changed the location info in the
files of
the widget directly without the interface? By that I mean to
edit what
ever label now exists in whatever file that contains it? If this is
possible in this example then many changes in other applications
could be
done using apple script and/or a terminal shell script.
XB
IC|XC
