Keep in mind that I wrote that description of Second Life without a great deal of thought and without knowing a huge amount about Second Life myself. Seems like we're getting stuck in a rut over what Second Life is, rather than figuring out whether Second Life is doable here. Let's get the thread back to whether Second Life is usable, however mud-like or un-mud-like second life might be.
Woah, not sure I could've fitted saying Second Life in there anymore times, and it wasn't even intentional. It's an infuriating read, sorry about that chaps. Scott On 9/24/08, Buddy Brannan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Sep 23, 2008, at 2:55 PM, Orin wrote: > >> Well, let's see. 66000 players on at once? And the fact that it has >> 3D Graphics and sound makes it not a mud. And I don't think there is >> any stragity elements to it. > > Not all muds had strategy elements (see moos and mushes). And from > your description, it sure sounds like what I said: a mud on steroids. >> > >
