Daniel Carrera wrote: > Mathias Bauer wrote: > >> Sorry, but why do you think that it was less than an hour's work (what >> is in fact wrong)? > > I'm so sorry. It was judging from when the issue was approved, and when it > was fixed.
The explanation for that is : because there was a lot of noise around that feature we didn't want to approve a fix for 2.0 before we are sure that we can make it. Consider the case that we had promised a fix for 2.0 and then had discovered that it's too much work to do - the result would have been worse than if we had done nothing! So after all necessary code changes where defined, all possible localization issues had been ruled out a first prototype was implemented. Then the QA had a look on that build and after they gave an "OK" I changed the target to "2.0". Of course no more work was necessary then except integration of the fix into the master. This explains the *very* short time differences. :-) Best regards, Mathias -- Mathias Bauer - OpenOffice.org Application Framework Project Lead Please reply to the list only, [EMAIL PROTECTED] is a spam sink. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
