--- Peter Kupfer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Rich wrote:
> > Peter Kupfer wrote:
> >
> >> Rich wrote:
> >
> > ...
> >
> >>> daniel has mentioned that some aspects of oo.org seem strange - i,
> >>> for example, find strange that a feature is removed (and not only
> >>> from interface, but also functionally) for a completely unfounded
> >>> reason.
> >>
> >>
> >> Technically, it hasn't been removed from the interface as the check
> >> box is still in the options, it just has no functionality. :)
> >
> >
> > well, ok, it most probably will be removed in 2.0 final :)
> Yeah, one of the big issues to me is the hard hazard way they cut out
> the feature. They removed the functunality, but left a shadow that makes
> the finished product appear unfinished.
What in the world? Why do we need to remove the URL bar? It can still be
valuable when working with web pages, and even for some text documents. It sure
saves time when inserting specialized hyperlinks directly into documents.
As far as I'm concerned, unless a feature is a hazaard, why bother taking it
out? Just move it off to the side, or turn it off, leaving it up to the user to
do what they like with it.
You could argue that features can get too cluttered and complicated, but hey,
whatever turns the crank of the developers. I kind of like see-ing evolutionary
progress versus revolutionary progress. I view evolution as being more
balanced, and somewhat less error prone.
Rigel
>
> Have a good night,
>
> --
> Peter Kupfer
> OOo user since 'OO4
> http://peschtra.tripod.com/open_office/ooo_front.htm
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
______________________________________________________________________
Post your free ad now! http://personals.yahoo.ca
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
