Mensaje citado por Sam Hiser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > On Tue, 2005-04-05 at 21:38 +0200, Nicolas Mailhot wrote: > > Le lundi 04 avril 2005 à 18:09 +0300, Alexandro Colorado a écrit : > > > This is funny, since when the enterprise and the general consumer had a > division > > > when it comes to windows? So why would it even matter in Linux? > > > > NT4/98 ? > > > > There is a difference: the environments sponsor quite different > requirements. > -Sam >
Sorry, but which enviroments are you talking about? You mean third parties? I don't remember the last third party that specified that has to be Windows Professional, usually they just say XP, the reason is because the KernelNT is the same. Regardless of that, third parties doesn't really matter, since the same happens with Linux. Yea most people will say it only runs with Red Hat enterprise, but we know that the reality is that it can run on any Linux. So if the profile goes at how many support deals we got from third parties, then it really doesn't matter on what you actually get for your money but what the company gets with your money. This is what beats the Linux is free as beer concept because the support is embedded with the OS, but it doesn't really validate the technology.Since Windows doesn't have anything anyway when you buy it. Linux has enterprise ready Apache MySQL PHP SendMail FTP-server and hundred of software it doesnt matter if its Mandrake Move or Red Hat enterprise. -- Alexandro Colorado Co-Leader of OpenOffice.org Spanish http://es.openoffice.org/ --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
