bealach wrote:
However if the PC World review of Oo2 beta is right the database is very much like M$ Access which PC World claims is not very good and users don't like it very much.
This is very vague. Can you elaborate on exactly what is wrong with it and what should be different?
Suppose for example that you are making a software product. Someone comes in and says "your product is not very good, can you make it better?". Now, how would you respond to this person?1
I was only reporting what PC World said, wasn't I?
Better not ask me what I'd say -- I'd say "Sorry, will try and do better next time".
I thought OOoBase was much superior to MS Access. For example, OOo Base has the ability to connect to 12 different databases out of the box (e.g. MySQL, Oracle) and many more thorugh other interfaces. By comparison MS Access is just one database. We do have a database engine called HSQLDB which provides a fuctionality vs ease of use tradeoff that is comparable to that of Access....
Good then! PC World was unfair then, or didn't look into the matter very much.
Cheers,
bealach
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
