On Lun 25 avril 2005 14:01, Mathias Bauer a �crit : > Nicu Buculei wrote: >> Mathias Bauer wrote: >>> >>>>On Lun 25 avril 2005 0:04, Mathias Bauer a �crit : >>>> >>>>>Wether the system package manager needs to be informed depends on the >>>>>way the Add-On interacts with the system. If all Add-Ons are self >>>>>contained and do not need any other "packages" except the OOo >>>>>installation I don't see a problem. >>> >>> If you really had taken some time and understood how the OOo packages >>> work you wouldn't write such nonsense. Sorry, but you don't know what >>> you are talking about. >> >> For example, consider a possible add-on is a clipart package created >> from the Open Clip Art Library (http://openclipart.org), which has a >> release every month. >> How do you suggest this package to be installed and updated: using OOo >> package management or using the system one? >> (yes, this question is a trap, only one response is correct, the other >> is completely wrong) > > I would construct the case the other way around. Do you really want that > *everything* on your system must be installed through the same > installer/packager? Every script, every macro, every configuration file?
Yes. This is Linux packaging 101. -- Nicolas Mailhot --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
