M. Fioretti wrote: > On Sat, May 14, 2005 01:30:19 AM +0200, Mathias Bauer > ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > >> Yes, Daniel names it: we want to see UNO package based deployment >> replacing the document based one. Together with our basic common >> agreement that we want to start investigating how to create native >> packages from UNO packages I don't see any contradictions between >> your statement and mine (complemented by Daniel). > > Now I understand better yours and Daniel's argument, thanks. Mine, > however, remains that for not OO.o-specific stuff (templates, > clip-art...) there is no need to make native packages out of UNO > ones. They can be built in a simpler way right from the raw material, > if the right info is provided.
Agreed. For packages containing no code or OOo configuration files we don't need UNO packages by ourselves, provided that the content of the package is delivered to any standard location that OOo already knows and uses. Otherwise users had to change OOo configuration settings manually to get access to the installed content and that's something that shouldn't happen. Once standard directories for templates and clip-arts are defined and supported by OOo you could install to those directories and immediately use them from inside OOo. Best regards, Mathias -- Mathias Bauer - OpenOffice.org Application Framework Project Lead Please reply to the list only, [EMAIL PROTECTED] is a spam sink. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
