Ken Foskey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Tue, 2005-05-03 at 10:15 +0200, Johan Vromans wrote: > >> So the question remains: will OOo be released 'built correctly' (not >> requiring _any_ Java), in multiple forms (with/without Java), or just >> with Java leaving the 'built correctly' version as an exercise to the >> community? > > I believe that the question is moot. The packagers for your brand Linux > will provide a package that works, this is enough for 90% of our users.
Sigh. It seems to be very hard to get a simple answer to a simple question. For the time being I'll assume that OOo 2 will require Java. -- Johan --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
