On Fri, May 13, 2005 12:47:34 PM +0200, Nicolas Mailhot
([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> > In other words, both now and in perspective, if something is
> > available as UNO package, I can easily make a native package of
> > it... as long as I have and keep another packager natively
> > packaged?
> >
> > Hmmm... not so interesting for stuff that could be used outside
> > OO.o, is it?
>
> My (admitedly weak) understanding of how the whole thing should work
> is :
[...]
> So you only need the oo.o packaging utility at build time
If so, yes, it probably wouldn't be a big deal.
> But then I've got on [EMAIL PROTECTED] but it seems no one is discussing it
> there. And I'm not sure technical discussions belong in discuss.
Well, maybe the problem is that this is only partly a technical
problem. At any rate, that's why I keep posting here.
Ciao,
Marco F.
--
Marco Fioretti mfioretti, at the server mclink.it
Fedora Core 3 for low memory http://www.rule-project.org/
Preserve the old, but know the new.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]