On Sun, 2005-07-24 at 01:23 -0500, Peter Kupfer OOo wrote: > Ian Lynch wrote: > > > > BTW, I think you are wrong and he is right. Thoughtfulness and > > politeness cost very little, but then I am a bit old-fashioned like > > that.
> That is why the responses to the OP are so critical. But he is just suggesting a more efficient way of getting the same effect. Its surprising when we are constantly told there is a shortage of volunteer time that suggestions to improve efficiency end up getting flamed. The only logical explanation is that those doing the flaming simply don't understand the point. In my view the project needs to be more responsive to such suggestions or all the innovators will simply leave in frustration. There might well be some reason not to do what Marco suggests but I can't think of one and no-one is really responding to that issue, just arguing their particular aspect of it. -- Ian Lynch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ZMSL --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
