On Tue, 1 Nov 2005 11:52:14 -0600 Matthew Keathley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> my experiance has always been that openoffice is slow and clunky. It > has great potential put it isn't there quite yet > > > On 11/1/05, RobinH <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > There is an article today on ZDnet describing a "test" which > > purports to show that Open Office 2.0 is a memory hog compared > > with MS Office. > > > > Can anyone comment? It sound like another put-up job. My experience > > with Open Office has been good. > > > > Rob > > Lets compare apples with oranges. Compare starting OpenOffice.org with starting Word, Excel, and Powerpoint all at the same time then you are a little closer to an even playing field. But even then the comparison is between apples and pears (two pip fruit). The value of this is questionable. -- Michael Those that can, do; those that can't, teach. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
