Tuesday, November 15, 2005 Phillip (Flip) Russell wrote: > The next rev of NeoOffice will require Java 1.4 which > doesn't exist on 10.2.
> Besides, 10.2 really should have been called a beta. > A horrible release with many bugs that were fixed in 10.3. > Also, technically there was never a stable X11 relase > for 10.2 either. The stable version was released with > 10.3 and never offered from Apple for 10.2. Well, it *could* be argued that if the 10.2 release was so crappy and buggy, you can't really expect *any* application to be stable on it. IOW, it's something you should bring up with Apple. In some way, there is a *similar* problem with Windows too, I don't know if OOo runs at all (and if yes, how good it runs) under the first release of Windows 95. -- Giuseppe "Oblomov" Bilotta --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
