Giuseppe Bilotta wrote:
Tuesday, November 15, 2005 Phillip (Flip) Russell wrote:
The next rev of NeoOffice will require Java 1.4 which
doesn't exist on 10.2.
Besides, 10.2 really should have been called a beta.
A horrible release with many bugs that were fixed in 10.3.
Also, technically there was never a stable X11 relase
for 10.2 either. The stable version was released with
10.3 and never offered from Apple for 10.2.
Well, it *could* be argued that if the 10.2 release was so
crappy and buggy, you can't really expect *any* application
to be stable on it. IOW, it's something you should bring up
with Apple. In some way, there is a *similar* problem with
Windows too, I don't know if OOo runs at all (and if yes,
how good it runs) under the first release of Windows 95.
I guess I should clarify.
I was strongly hinting that the original user should
get on a current version of Mac OS as there have been
TWO major releases since 10.2.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
