On Mon, 28 Nov 2005 00:04:30 -0000, Henrik Sundberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
2005/11/27, Daniel Carrera <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Irrelevant comparison. Document files are not programs. OOo is a 60 MB
program, not a 192kb document. OOo does rendering, memmory allocation,
loads external libraries, runs threads, and does a zillion other things
that documents don't do.
I was thinking of the files from the "memory hog" discussions found at
http://blogs.zdnet.com/Ou/?p=101
The unzipped XML (SXC) is 286 MB. Almost 5 times larger than OOo. The
MS XML equivalent was 193 MB. It is my firm belief that the parsing
time of the difference (93 MB) is noticeable.
The SXC file was only 3.6 MB, but the uncompressed size has to be
traversed in memory at least.
/Henrik
Sorry I havent really follow this topic but I just think to throw it out.
Federico Mena Quintero is a Developer from Ximian, sho has done a lot of
test about performance on GNOME.
http://primates.ximian.com/~federico/news-2005-10.html#oocalc-performance
Really interesting information when he went through sysprof.
--
Alexandro Colorado
CoLeader of OpenOffice.org ES
http://es.openoffice.org
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
