John W. Kennedy wrote:
12/05/2005  10:49 PM        69,999,781 test1.xml
12/05/2005  10:53 PM        26,167,179 test1.zip
12/05/2005  11:05 PM       167,999,781 test2.xml
12/05/2005  11:09 PM        28,641,918 test2.zip

Clearly, the size of the tagname is fairly unimportant.

Bingo. The tag names are easily-removed redundancy and are compressed away both on disk (by ZIP) and on memory (by pointers).

Cheers,
Daniel.
--
     /\/`) http://oooauthors.org
    /\/_/  http://opendocumentfellowship.org
   /\/_/
   \/_/    I am not over-weight, I am under-tall.
   /

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to