On Sun, 11 Dec 2005 00:30, Ian Lynch wrote:
> On Sat, 2005-12-10 at 10:38 +0000, CPHennessy wrote:
> > On Sat December 10 2005 09:25, Roger Markus wrote:
> > >      In 1995 Antel, the national telephone company of Uruguay, was
> > > caught pirating $100,000 worth of unlicensed software programs from
> > > Microsoft, Novell, and Symantec.
> >
> > Any company using pirated software can be brought to court. they can
> > also reach a "plea bargin" with the original proprietary companies to
> > retroactively license their software.
> >
> > This is not a reason to despise Microsoft, rather it is a reason to use
> > open source software.
> >
> > Now is there some question about OpenOffice.org is this discussion ?
>
> The main issue is simply that there is a lot of evidence about that can
> be used in the promotion of OpenOffice.org. It has to be used carefully
> but it is a potential marketing advantage and we have precious few of

Add these piracy to privacy and malware concerns and asking a few hard 
questions - eg, how much productivity is lost to malware each month?  What is 
your legal recourse to a situation where programming errors on the part of 
the vendor leaves you wide open to privacy-violating malware - incidentally 
making one liable for breaches of confidence with one's customers - and at 
the same time the vendor can audit you on suspicion of copyright 
misappropriation?

It's possible to ask extremely emotive questions about the competitor without 
getting emotional oneself - all that it needs to to make the audience think 
for long enough to realise just what the situation is.  Let them provide the 
emotion.

Wesley Parish
> those. Countering a $360m a year propaganda machine for MSO is not that
> simple with no marketing budget. Its not a matter of despising anyone
> and use of evidence in such a way so as not to appear to be particularly
> emotive is often the best way to do things. However, its difficult to
> see how active appeasement of Microsoft actually does anything to help
> OOo. On balance its largely down to confidence. MS knows this. Undermine
> confidence in the opposition, boost confidence in your product. Let's
> just do it, but do it with apparent objectivity ;-).

-- 
Clinersterton beademung, with all of love - RIP James Blish
-----
Mau e ki, he aha te mea nui?
You ask, what is the most important thing?
Maku e ki, he tangata, he tangata, he tangata.
I reply, it is people, it is people, it is people.

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to