Alexandro Colorado wrote: > [this] doesn't address the original question, which is > if we should promote [Cosmopod].
www.openoffice.org says "the productivity suite that... governments, and corporations... have been expecting for the last two years" as in "gee, is this a professional, business oriented thing or what?" www.cosmopod.com says "Work on your private stuff without worrying about whether your company is snooping. CosmoPOD... is also a neat way to bypass your company's firewall". (Yeah, those bastards deserve it, don't they?) (*) Trying it, sure. Recommending it to relatives, friends etc.. probably. Using it when on vacation, visiting grandma and so on, maybe. But placing an official endorsement of something like this on OO.org? I may agree that companies creating such feelings and needs in their workplace entirely deserve what they get but...Heh.. :-) Apart from what volunteers may "decide", I wouldn't be surprised to see Sun just reply "yeah, right", or just block it, should this discussion turn into a "yes" Ciao, Marco (*)Oh, and as far as I can see, Cosmopod doesn't even mention OO.o or any other program used, or the negligible fact that installing SW without permission on company HW is explicitly forbidden in many offices. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
