Oh, crud.  Sorry.  You are right.  I just skipped that word somehow.  I saw
"next release" and got the installer stuck in my head.  My bad.

The main problem with using 7z instead of zip isn't that it's basically not
supported in anything but Windows (because, as the OP said, it's open
source, so we could intragate the compression into OpenOffice.org which
would make it crossplatform).  The problem is, ODF is already a standardized
format.  Basically, it's too late to be changing it now.  If OOo was the
only one to use ODF, then sure, we could change it anytime.  But it's a
OASIS standard, and is, or soon will be, an ISO standard.  It is used by
other programs, like KOffice, Writely, and AbiWord.  It's out of our hands
now.

Whether or not 7z would have been a better choice, I can't say.  But it
would be a bad idea for OOo to start using it now, because then we would be
non-standard to the format we helped create.

Thanks for the suggestion, though.

-Chad

On 7/18/06, Rich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

Chad Smith wrote:
> We actually did use the 7z compression for the Windows port one
time.  It
> was a self-contained self-extractor, (so no one needed to have 7-Zip
> installed).  It saved about 20 MB of download.  I'm not sure why we
stopped
> using it, other than Daniel and I haven't been making the extractor.  I
> thought the releases group was going to start using it - but I guess
they
> haven't been.

that's about installer - but the original poster mentioned odf in his
message, so that seemed to be a suggestion to replace zip with 7z in
file formats.
...
--
  Rich

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]




--
- Chad Smith
http://www.gimpshop.net/
http://www.whatisopenoffice.org/
http://www.chadwsmith.com/

Reply via email to