I don't doubt that a community development has insufficient resources to
tackle this on its own.
You have to take notice, I think, when such successful organisations are
heading in a certain direction.
I begin to wonder, when people no longer need to download, install and
update, such software themselves, how many will continue to do so. I
tried Google's test spreadsheet briefly and it was very easy to use.
Ian Lynch wrote:
On Thu, 2006-09-14 at 22:57 -0500, Alexandro Colorado wrote:
<snip> This has been constantly talked about while is true that weba
applications
are a buzz word. The OpenOffice.org community development is based on
mantaining and extending the UNO framework.
This framework will be arguably dificult to move to a HTML toolkit. Most
OOo people focus on having compatibility with this suites thanks to the
adoption of OpenDocuments.
A gap in between is webservices and how can OOo can operate as desktop
client for this new web applications.
Agreed, its a resources issue. There are not unlimited resources. OOo
has to decide what it can afford to achieve. Since the Google seem
committed to ODF we should get web based applications that interoperate
reliably with OOo so why reinvent the wheel? Let some others pay for
some of the development costs that free up office productivity.
--
If you're seeking, check out http://www.rci.org.au
An OS gem: http://www.pclinuxos.com/page.php?6
Send instant messages to your online friends http://au.messenger.yahoo.com
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
