Hei, > No it's not. > OO.o has a very powerful styling feature > It's been used and abused for all sorts of things (langage, link objects) > that have nothing in common with presentation. > > Styles are *not* a generic "text attribute" framework. Or rather they can > be deep down but this concept should never permeate the UI (like it does > now) > > I've lost track of all the UI bugs I've seen where the developper wanted > to have things behave like presentation when for the user it's content > just because both use styles and what styles are is not clearly defined > today. > > Presentation is something that can be changed without altering the > document meaning. Content should be preserved at all costs. You mix both > you get UI disasters.
this discussion is heading in a good direction. ;-) Yes, i mean it, André.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
