... but what about user perception?
This is where I believe any damage could be done with the article title as it is. The tool in no way 'cracks' the OOo protection for opening files. As mentioned before it is simply brute force with some fancy dictionaries. However when users see 'crack' they immediately assume that there is something wrong with the protection scheme (as there is with Excel protection). That could be damaging especially when users tend not to read all the details of the product - just the article and title. /paul -- Vista is "dramatically more secure than any other operating system released" Bill Gates Huh ?? Defender doesn't stop spyware (Webroot) ; firewall is only 50% effective (Zdnet) ; UAC can be turned off and is annoying ; SP1 (incl security reasons) due end of 2007... ----- Try Torpark; a small portable, open-source, built on Firefox browser that enables anonymous browsing. Requires no installation : http://www.torrify.com/ --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
