On Oct 11, 2008, at 7:16 AM, Michael Adams wrote:

A little bit of research brought me up to the play on this (hopefully).

A quick look at Latin1 (ISO-8859-1)[1] shows few ligatures past the "&"
which has been normalised into modern usage, "Æ", "æ" which i dont see
used much beyond encyclopaedia, the german esszett and nordic thorn.
Unicode will give better results[2]. As a bonus the XML of ODF is in
UTF-8.


So all you need is a good font and a few keyboard shortcuts and
Bobs your uncle.

Philistine!! <grin> Heck I got by with RADIX50 more popularly known as RAD50. It only had upper case, numerals, and a few punctuation marks, and a floating character. In order to extend it the floating character was generally defined as a shift which added lower case. You have to admit it was limited but you could do what needed to be done with it.

When MS came along with DOS they intended their computers 'for business use'. They added the full ASCII character set and graphics. The graphics were bitmapped. Apple came along with the arrival of Adobe and Postscript. They used Postscript Fonts and vector graphics. Now from looking at a page printed on an Apple Laser printer and one printed on a Laser printer with MS it was hard to see much improvement from Apple. But scale the original (make it a poster not just letter sized) and the bitmapped fonts and graphics from MS sucked.

The point is that if Open Office wants to allow the production of high quality typeset pages then they need to support all the glyphs and that would mean properly supporting ligatures, diacritical marks, etc and supporting them means more than simply printing them. It means minimally the spell checker needs to recognize words with those glyphs embedded in them.

I have used Open Office for a couple of years but participated in discussions on its features for a very short time. I don't know if this has been asked and answered before. Please excuse my ignorance if it has, but is the expansion of the feature set based on ad hoc suggestions or is their a more global plan. For example is open office a business tool i.e. MS's model which was practical and minimal or more grand like Apple's? Is it planned to become more like PageMaker or stay more like Word? Is it going to remain a tool thats good for moderately large documents (50 pages) like Word or should it handle large documents even sets of volumes with all the cross referencing and indexing tools such a project requires?

Automatic ligatures are not what the average keyboard
user desires.

Automatic ligatures are nice but how would you implement them? Would you simply recognize the letter trio/pair and replace them with the ligatures glyph or would you recognize the word both with the codes for all the letters are present as well as when the letter trio/pair is replace by the ligature's code is the same word.

Remember the value of them was originally in the time saved typesetting a book, prettiness was secondary[3].

I think they're pretty and that's that! <grin>

For many situations ie databases, unicode recommend againsts ligature use[4].


The problem I expect is that if you use the code for the glyph instead of recognizing the ligature for example and displaying the glyph for the letter pair then data entry might get screwed up with some entries having the ligature and others having the letter pair.

BTW I seem to remember Postscript Type 1 fonts are the most comprehensive of the methods for creating typefaces. You can also embed images in them just like Postscript pages. Yippe!

If Open Office were to fully support ligatures both automatically as well as manually then if you consider the flexibility of Type 1 fonts you can see that special rather complex glyphs can be constructed locally which could save a lot of time for people at their computer just like the ligatures did for the typesetter.

--
St. Doug, Tigger and Puppy in our memory.
Tir na nOg
Wilton, NH USA






---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to