Copy forwarded to Steven Liauw - Non-Subscribed Poster

-------- Original Message  --------
From: jonathon <[email protected]>
To: [email protected]
Date: Wed, 9 Sep 2009 21:07:54 +0000

> On Wed, Sep 9, 2009 at 09:30, Steven Liauw wrote:
> 
>> 1. It will be better in my opinion if OpenOffice use a tab system when 
>> opening more than one document. So, there will be only one Window, but 
>> several "tabs" open.
> 
> For OOo 2.x, there is a macro that provides tab features.  For word,
> it  almost works.   It doesn't work for Calc.
> 
>> that is very powerful is the Reveal Code
> 
> For OOo  1.x and 2.x  there  is a macro for word, and a different
> macro for calc, that provides similar information to that provided by
> WP's reveal codes.
> 
>> It's basically a way to let users see the "code" underlying the document.
> 
> That feature had to be included in WP, because of bugs related to how
> WP implemented styles.  Not only is OOo  not a stream editor, but it
> also uses a different methodology for implementing styles.
> 
>> This way, a user can quickly find out why the document is not displaying as 
>> he wants.
> 
> a)  The only reason a document does not display what the person
> expected, is becuae the person was not using  styles properly.
> 
> b) If  you configure the formatting toolbar correctly, and know what
> the attributes of the styles that you use are, you can obtain the same
> data as that provided by WPs reveal codes.
> 
>> It also allows the user to see where certain codes are, such as the page 
>> break, the margin, etc.
> 
> The best improvement to OOo would be  to remove the  ability to
> display the formatting  toolbar.  Removing all toolbars, requiring
> keyboard commands would improve both the  functionality, and  ease of
> using OOo by several orders  of magnitude. (It would also mean that it
> was a11y --- which is something that both MSO and  OOo currently
> fail.)
> 
> jonathon


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]

Reply via email to