On 04/19/2010 11:39 PM, Dr. Bernhard Dippold wrote:
I thought my reply to your mail showed what I really meant.
It might, it might not.
Now I used the word "copy" again ...
Regardless of the string of letters used, copy by any other name has the same meaning semantically. So when you mean copy, it's not surprising that you use the word, again and again. Repeated use over time of the same semantic context shows the sincerity of the apparent wish to either copy or frame as a copy. The former is not appropriate for projects that wish to succeed and the latter is inaccurate (at best) and appears an effort at revisionism.
The trick, "let's say one thing and do another" might work for kids or be funny on the playground at your school, but it does impare group work and does have other detrimental effects.
/Lars --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
