Thorsten, oh that's rich, coming from Novell staff.
His apology is made of fine words, but the behavior repeats. Copying by
any other name is still a semantically incorrect description of the
project's status, history and, I do hope, goals.
All that is a distraction from the problem of revisionism. It's been an
issue several times before and that it's happening again only means that
it needs to be dealt with again.
Here are a few old articles that address the problem the time it came up
with OOo 2
http://smallbusinessreview.com/technology/Free_Office_Software/
http://opennotes.wordpress.com/2007/12/05/8-simple-rules-for-switching-to-openofficeorg/
Regards
/Lars
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: discuss-unsubscr...@openoffice.org
For additional commands, e-mail: discuss-h...@openoffice.org
