Hi Marco, I'm a developer and completely understand your points. Continuing disagreement with your position is not evidence that I don't. Progress and learning cannot be achieved when one side says - "if you still disagree with me it can only be because you don't understand my completely correct position, so I'll just repeat it".

Specifically, I have tried as best as possible to respond, pointing for example to the incredible progress already made, and the minor nature of many of the remaining issues - i.e. alignment - and even suggested a specific cleanroom process to proceed. These are where your energy should be spent if you want to help, instead of continually repeating your point without responding to my points in a spirit of dialogue.

There is no need to get personal. I will continue to advocate this position, shared by the vast majority of actual OO users themselves as per the surveys included in my original post. I hope no-one pushing this position will be discouraged by your suggestion they should not engage in these discussions because they aren't intellecutally capable of understanding what you say. OO has not had the success we all wish it would, and the problem I raise is the main reason why. This is important.

Thanks,
Bill

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]

Reply via email to