On Wed, Jul 13, 2011 at 02:31, Aniruddha Laud <[email protected]> wrote: > I am following the cookbook at http://openvswitch.org/?page_id=146 . I don't > want to create one single bridge, but I want to be able to have open > vswitches running on different hosts and still be able to talk to each > other. In short, I want to remove the eth0 - eth0 connection mentioned in > the cookbook and replace it with a tunnel if possible, so that a VM on host1 > can communicate with a VM on host2.
It probably depends on the type of tunnel, but I don't see any problem with this. Ben or Justin might have more input on what kinds of interfaces you can use, but I would think that if you create any tunnel that creates an interface, you're ok - just add that interface to the bridge (instead of, or in addition to, eth0). -- Nick _______________________________________________ discuss mailing list [email protected] http://openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
