Okay, thanks :) On Tue, Jul 12, 2011 at 11:34 PM, Nicholas Bastin <[email protected]>wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 13, 2011 at 02:31, Aniruddha Laud <[email protected]> > wrote: > > I am following the cookbook at http://openvswitch.org/?page_id=146 . I > don't > > want to create one single bridge, but I want to be able to have open > > vswitches running on different hosts and still be able to talk to each > > other. In short, I want to remove the eth0 - eth0 connection mentioned in > > the cookbook and replace it with a tunnel if possible, so that a VM on > host1 > > can communicate with a VM on host2. > > It probably depends on the type of tunnel, but I don't see any problem > with this. Ben or Justin might have more input on what kinds of > interfaces you can use, but I would think that if you create any > tunnel that creates an interface, you're ok - just add that interface > to the bridge (instead of, or in addition to, eth0). > > -- > Nick >
_______________________________________________ discuss mailing list [email protected] http://openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
