When it doesn't work I have a host unreachable while trying to ping a device on 
the 192.168.200.x. I see that the icmp packets are routed to the right 
interface (the one attached to the bridge with the tunnel, with the 
IP=192.168.200.4), but it seems that the tunnel is too long to see its end:

root@bm-1:~# ping 192.168.200.1
PING 192.168.200.1 (192.168.200.1) 56(84) bytes of data.
>From 192.168.200.4 icmp_seq=2 Destination Host Unreachable
>From 192.168.200.4 icmp_seq=3 Destination Host Unreachable
>From 192.168.200.4 icmp_seq=4 Destination Host Unreachable
>From 192.168.200.4 icmp_seq=5 Destination Host Unreachable
>From 192.168.200.4 icmp_seq=6 Destination Host Unreachable
>From 192.168.200.4 icmp_seq=7 Destination Host Unreachable



JC
On Nov 2, 2011, at 10:16 AM, Jesse Gross wrote:

> On Wed, Nov 2, 2011 at 10:09 AM, JC Martin <[email protected]> wrote:
>>  gre1 was built with the following command:
>>  [root@xcp-2 ~]# ovs-vsctl add-port xapi1 gre1 -- set interface gre1 
>> type=gre options:remote_ip=172.16.188.200
>> 
>>  I tried to replicate the xenserver setup on bm-1 by adding a bridge with 
>> eth0 as a port, adding another bridge with the tunnel and an interface, but 
>> it has not been successful (i tried also with only one bridge with the 
>> tunnel and an interface). Ideally, on bm-1 I would like to have two 
>> interfaces, one on 172.16.188.x and one on my private network (192.168.200.x)
> 
> That should be fine as long as bm-1 is reachable on 172.16.188.200.
> What do you see when it doesn't work?

_______________________________________________
discuss mailing list
[email protected]
http://openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss

Reply via email to