Hi James

sorry for the very late reply. Had some email filtering issues and missed that 
message. 

have now updated all servers to that non-optimized package.

So I do have now:

4 servers with 3.16 kernel and unoptimized ovs package
1 server with 3.13 kernel and unoptimized ovs package

Will report back how it goes.

cheers
marco


 <http://www.nuvula.ch/>
Marco Kuendig / CEO / Founder 
ma...@nuvula.ch <mailto:ma...@nuvula.ch> / +41 78 751 99 71

Marco's Google Hangout <https://plus.google.com/hangouts/_/nuvula.ch/marco>
Nuvula AG - Hybrid Clouds 
Weierbachstrasse 7b 8193 Eglisau Switzerland 
http://www.nuvula.ch <http://www.nuvula.ch/>
> On 22 Apr 2015, at 10:52, James Page <james.p...@ubuntu.com> wrote:
> 
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA256
> 
> Marco
> 
> Apologies for my foobar in not managing to provide un-optimized
> binaries when I thought I had - apparently the ovs packaging
> outsmarted me.
> 
> I've push a verified -O0 build to ppa:james-page/openvswitch
> 
> If you could retry with the latest packages from that PPA that would
> be great - then we can really figure out whether this is an optimizer
> issue or not...
> 
> Regards
> 
> James
> 
> On 21/04/15 08:01, Marco Kuendig wrote:
>> thanks James for the answer. No problem.
>> 
>> Let me know if I can test anything and I will give it a try.
>> 
>> cheers marco
>> 
>> 
>> Nuvula AG <http://www.nuvula.ch/>
>> 
>> Marco Kuendig / CEO / Founder ma...@nuvula.ch
>> <mailto:ma...@nuvula.ch> / +41 78 751 99 71
>> 
>> Marco's Google Hangout
>> <https://plus.google.com/hangouts/_/nuvula.ch/marco>
>> 
>> Nuvula AG - Hybrid Clouds Weierbachstrasse 7b 8193 Eglisau
>> Switzerland http://www.nuvula.ch <http://www.nuvula.ch/>
>> 
>> 
>>> On 20 Apr 2015, at 17:23, James Page <james.p...@ubuntu.com 
>>> <mailto:james.p...@ubuntu.com>> wrote:
>>> 
>> Hi Marco
>> 
>> Not ignoring you - just a bit busy with Ubuntu 15.04 release at
>> the moment - so apologies for any lag.
>> 
>> On 16/04/15 21:13, Marco Kuendig wrote:
>>>>> #2  0x0000000000460cd2 in format_odp_key_attr 
>>>>> (a=a@entry=0x19798d4, ma=ma@entry=0x0,
>>>>> ds=ds@entry=0x7ffc6c10bd10, verbose=verbose@entry=true) at
>>>>> ../lib/odp-util.c:1332
>> 
>> The thing that has us puzzled is why at this point in the stack is
>> the automatic variable 'is_exact' not true:
>> 
>> case OVS_KEY_ATTR_UNSPEC: case __OVS_KEY_ATTR_MAX: default: 
>> format_generic_odp_key(a, ds); if (!is_exact) { ds_put_char(ds,
>> '/'); format_generic_odp_key(ma, ds); } break; }
>> 
>> As the 'ma' parameter is 0, this should mean that is_exact
>> follows:
>> 
>> is_exact = ma ? odp_mask_attr_is_exact(ma) : true;
>> 
>> and as ma == 0 then is_exact should == true.  But for some reason
>> its no t.
>> 
>> As you see this with the un-optimized package, we can't blame the 
>> optimizer - so something else must be happening - maybe an
>> overflow?
>> 
>> That would have to happen in L952->L978 so not a huge amount of
>> scope.
>> 
>> It might be good to see if we can determine whether namebuf is the 
>> culprit.
>> 
>> 
> 
> - -- 
> James Page
> Ubuntu and Debian Developer
> james.p...@ubuntu.com
> jamesp...@debian.org
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v2
> 
> iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJVN2E7AAoJEL/srsug59jDLJcQAKKzaKdfp7YvrEcasIaLKffh
> mO0KO6MbVWp+42gaW/1XuT3wa2nZuVgjGaytb5NC/EJy1O3viQVQMWJIJosBoK5f
> xbxC1z+3IRhnF8r27elql8nE/bxLVGpj4jUXySV7Ad1ede/3P3T30TcnhCkXNaKi
> 2CcOE9MUAj+2sp4C3VUXwRxdTZio1dJ+A6lDoA65p7brWroKNhY1Y0g1ct97tVE+
> YLaZK3oOuVt6++CX5KPE7hR1XBk5ojKxMUtIDP5T/az7zDSokVk2GR3CYJHg57kh
> SfvGw4r0PbkKn0W3E4u3HSCimlizy40Ior9qUuvNC8F4kDq7LWW3WE6ggb+X34N0
> 5AetDHEgRB7eFBTWlLmC4Gop7mrQP/wBqmDJJoMr+jxEJC8HoSpRYoFixAPi+6w7
> O3SqOPCMpND0EHqCF60fn5zUFyXWEqWgrunEauhqPJ6swo1Uzyu52ONSZQ+V27UY
> bqnDBjq5JAU5QbSTAY52ugAsW+GGobykdduxuL0Uz8cppZ/Vlkm/wh8XtAfN3nTh
> GbYItkp9xRNesq6Q+beL0tFVLJWuvQNDv4LsFBzgAGRE/9Aw91A1T2GtOvLbLACa
> SmM2FMt4NBVV7ANqKUP1F8mACyKtbhepPVO2Oidx/ytogO+oZYtNaRNK+UwQvj/0
> lFtr4VM3A0nI8s0zFeyP
> =mulJ
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

_______________________________________________
discuss mailing list
discuss@openvswitch.org
http://openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss

Reply via email to