> In Howie's refining the "i<limit" test to come up with a safer > alternative, he inadvertantly put "limit-i<1" which is mathematically > not the same -- I assume he meant "limit - i > 0". I would always write (limit-i) > 0 since I don't trust compilers and their damn precedence rules. L. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- PPIG Discuss List (discuss@ppig.org) Discuss admin: http://limitlessmail.net/mailman/listinfo/discuss Announce admin: http://limitlessmail.net/mailman/listinfo/announce PPIG Discuss archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/discuss%40ppig.org/
- PPIG discuss: Loop Bounds and Errors Russel Winder
- RE: PPIG discuss: Loop Bounds and Errors Lindsay Marshall
- Re: PPIG discuss: Loop Bounds and Errors Frank Wales
- RE: PPIG discuss: Loop Bounds and Errors Lindsay Marshall
- Re: PPIG discuss: Loop Bounds and Errors Howie Goodell
- Re: PPIG discuss: Loop Bounds and Errors Frank Wales
- Re: PPIG discuss: Loop Bounds and Err... William Billingsley
- RE: PPIG discuss: Loop Bounds an... Lindsay Marshall
- Re: PPIG discuss: Loop Bound... Nevin Liber
- Re: PPIG discuss: Loop Bounds and Errors Derek M Jones
- Re: PPIG discuss: Loop Bounds and Errors Bjorn Reese
- Re: PPIG discuss: Loop Bounds and Errors Sarah Mount
- PPIG discuss: Teach the common stuff: was Loo... Derek M Jones
- RE: PPIG discuss: Teach the common stuff:... Lindsay Marshall
- Re: PPIG discuss: Teach the common stuff:... Sarah Mount
- RE: PPIG discuss: Teach the common st... Lindsay Marshall
- Re: PPIG discuss: Teach the comm... Frank Wales
- Re: PPIG discuss: Teach the common st... Derek M Jones