Hi Mike, The problem with java.net.URI is that you must specify the URI parts at construction time. There are no setters and no way to nicely build a URI piecemeal. That leads to string concatenation and other ugliness
Kevin On Nov 29, 2007 2:43 PM, Mike Brzozowski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Kevin Conaway <kevin.conaway <at> gmail.com> writes: > > Would it be possible add a new class called URI to facilitate building > URIs to > use in client calls? It can be cumbersome to either build the uri as a > string > by hand or use the heavy Reference class.I suggest adding a lightweight > class > called URI that allows users to easily build URIs like the following: > > Check out the URI class introduced in JDK 1.4... it might do much of what > you're > looking for: > > http://java.sun.com/javase/6/docs/api/java/net/URI.html > > --Mike > >
