I second Michael's thoughts. I looked at restlets half a dozen or so times
over the past year or so before finally taking the plunge a couple of weeks
ago.

While I might not say it's the easiest framework I've ever used, it is very
nice once you get the hang of it. It took a couple of days of fiddling, but
now I do all kinds of great stuff with it and I just love it.

Alex, what were you trying to do? I found that following the First Steps,
First Resource and Tutorial, step by step, was very helpful. I actually went
back and forth between the First Steps and the First Resource a few times
before I really got the hang of it.

http://www.restlet.org/documentation/1.1/firstSteps
http://www.restlet.org/documentation/1.1/firstResource
http://www.restlet.org/documentation/1.1/tutorial

Hope it helps.

--Erik

On Thu, Sep 18, 2008 at 11:47 PM, Michael Terrington <
[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> Hi Alex,
>
> Sorry to hear of your bad experience but I have to speak up to defend
> Restlet.  I've not seen a cleaner, easier to follow framework with so
> much flexibility before.
>
> I'm not sure how you were starting off, but I found that running
> standalone was the easiest to get going and understand.  It certainly
> helped to be able to breakpoint and follow the code.  Once you
> understand how Restlet handles and routes requests you should be in a
> good position to get more complicated.
>
> Regards,
> Michael.
>
> On Fri, Sep 19, 2008 at 11:33 AM, Alexei Sokolov
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Well,
> > I can't figure out how to do very simple things with restlets.
> > I get NPE in RC1, I cannot configure restlets the way I want and wiki
> does
> > not have anything useful on it.
> > So much for breaking away from servlets.
> > Sorry, but maybe when restlets reach v. 2.0 I will give it another try.
> > Alex
> >
>

Reply via email to