Yes.

On Fri, Nov 14, 2008 at 10:59 PM, Thierry Boileau <
[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> Hello,
>
> by "option 2", do you mean the standalone mode?
>
> best regards,
> Thierry Boileau
>
>
>
>  I am also quite interested in the latter two options.
>>
>> Will Restlet team give out a standard(or recommended) approach about how
>> to deploy a web application using for example option 2, for example a
>> WebApplication which has lots of well-defined elements for serving static
>> resources from a jar or some other locations?
>>
>> On Fri, Nov 14, 2008 at 10:10 PM, Rob Heittman <
>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>> wrote:
>>
>>    It depends on what you are trying to build with Restlet.
>>
>>    If you need something that a JEE container provides (e.g.
>>    lifecycle services, deploy/undeploy applications, integration with
>>    existing Servlet code), or are required to run in an existing JEE
>>    container for business reasons, then you should use the
>>    ServerServlet approach.
>>
>>    If you don't need any of the JEE container features and aren't
>>    using any Servlet API, it is good to have the ability to run
>>    Restlet in standalone mode (start Component from "main") with your
>>    choice of connector.  This is excellent for lightweight embedded
>>    systems, and also for any "legacy-free" new application which is
>>    designed totally around Restlet and doesn't need any JEE baggage.
>>
>>    There is also at least one other really interesting option, which
>>    is to run Restlet as an OSGi service within an OSGi framework.
>>     This shares some properties/advantages of both the JEE and
>>    Standalone approach, and introduces other neat possibilities.
>>     Some of us (at least Hendy and I that I know of) have played with
>>    Restlet on OSGi a lot.
>>
>>    - Rob
>>
>>    On Fri, Nov 14, 2008 at 8:47 AM, Gan123 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>    <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>> wrote:
>>
>>
>>        Hi,
>>
>>               i am new to restlet, started exploring. i found we can
>>        access an
>>        application mapped to ServerServlet in a web application, as
>>        well we can
>>        create a application where we use restlet client to create a
>>        client and use
>>        main to start application.
>>
>>        in the first approach we are using the web server, where as
>>        the second
>>        approach we use restlet webcontainer for our application
>>        launch.. am i
>>        right?
>>
>>        if not clarify me, as tell me which way is suggested and best
>>
>>        Thanks in advance
>>        --
>>        View this message in context:
>>
>> http://n2.nabble.com/which-is-better-way-for-web-application-using-RESTlet--tp1498498p1498498.html
>>        Sent from the Restlet Discuss mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Cheers,
>> Keke
>> -----------------
>> We paranoid love life
>>
>


-- 
Cheers,
Keke
-----------------
We paranoid love life

Reply via email to