On Thu, Apr 9, 2009 at 4:57 AM, Rob Heittman <[email protected]>wrote:
> ...my only *strong* requirement, that the annotation based solution must > remain a voluntary choice and not the only way to get things done. It > should remain possible to achieve whatever annotations can achieve in a > non-annotation way. This allows the basic API outline to work in places > where annotations are not available or work differently enough to cause > friction (pre-1.5 JVM backports, GWT, API ports to other languages, Scala > ...) It is OK with me if the non-annotation approach requires verbosity or > heavy lifting, it just needs to exist. > Isn't that currently the case with the 1.2 branch? (Does GWT not support annotations yet? I thought it did.) It would be best if the non-annotation approach used the same terminology as the annotations, and I think that's not the case right now. --tim ------------------------------------------------------ http://restlet.tigris.org/ds/viewMessage.do?dsForumId=4447&dsMessageId=1612961
