Hi Rob,

 

I agree Rob we should consider direct HttpCore usage. I have added a comment
in the related RFE.

 

Best regards,
Jerome Louvel
--
Restlet ~ Founder and Lead developer ~  <http://www.restlet.org/>
http://www.restlet.org
Noelios Technologies ~ Co-founder ~  <http://www.noelios.com/>
http://www.noelios.com

 

 

 

De : Rob Heittman [mailto:rob.heitt...@solertium.com] 
Envoyé : mercredi 6 mai 2009 15:46
À : discuss@restlet.tigris.org
Objet : Re: HttpClient Alternatives

 

 

Thanks, Bruno.  I was especially unaware that HttpClient 4.0 support had
been started already ... I'll check it out.  I wonder, too, if it mightn't
be possible to do something lighter based on HttpCore directly.

 

- Rob

 

On Wed, May 6, 2009 at 9:29 AM, Bruno Harbulot
<bruno.harbu...@manchester.ac.uk> wrote:

Apache HttpClient 4.x support in Restlet:
   http://restlet.tigris.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=639

Jetty Client:
   http://docs.codehaus.org/display/JETTY/Jetty+HTTP+Client

Plans for a Grizzly Http Client:
   https://grizzly.dev.java.net/servlets/ReadMsg?list=dev
<https://grizzly.dev.java.net/servlets/ReadMsg?list=dev&msgNo=2531>
&msgNo=2531

------------------------------------------------------
http://restlet.tigris.org/ds/viewMessage.do?dsForumId=4447&dsMessageId=2232540

Reply via email to