Hi Rob,
I agree Rob we should consider direct HttpCore usage. I have added a comment in the related RFE. Best regards, Jerome Louvel -- Restlet ~ Founder and Lead developer ~ <http://www.restlet.org/> http://www.restlet.org Noelios Technologies ~ Co-founder ~ <http://www.noelios.com/> http://www.noelios.com De : Rob Heittman [mailto:rob.heitt...@solertium.com] Envoyé : mercredi 6 mai 2009 15:46 À : discuss@restlet.tigris.org Objet : Re: HttpClient Alternatives Thanks, Bruno. I was especially unaware that HttpClient 4.0 support had been started already ... I'll check it out. I wonder, too, if it mightn't be possible to do something lighter based on HttpCore directly. - Rob On Wed, May 6, 2009 at 9:29 AM, Bruno Harbulot <bruno.harbu...@manchester.ac.uk> wrote: Apache HttpClient 4.x support in Restlet: http://restlet.tigris.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=639 Jetty Client: http://docs.codehaus.org/display/JETTY/Jetty+HTTP+Client Plans for a Grizzly Http Client: https://grizzly.dev.java.net/servlets/ReadMsg?list=dev <https://grizzly.dev.java.net/servlets/ReadMsg?list=dev&msgNo=2531> &msgNo=2531 ------------------------------------------------------ http://restlet.tigris.org/ds/viewMessage.do?dsForumId=4447&dsMessageId=2232540