Hello, (Please don't consider what I'm saying here as legal advice...)
Restlet 1.1.4 only bundles the compiled code (so no source code to scan there) and provides a link to <https://sjsxp.dev.java.net/>. The source bundle I've been able to get from <https://sjsxp.dev.java.net/> (I'm not sure it's the exact same version) contains a file called 'LICENCE.html' which is a dual licence: CDDL 1.0 and GPL 2.0. The only reference to BEA I've found is in the header of each source file, in the @author tag: "Copyright (c) 2003 by BEA Systems. All Rights Reserved." As far as I'm aware, this is just a copyright statement, not a BEA licence. There doesn't seem to be any licence in the file themselves, therefore, the licence is that written in the 'LICENCE.html' file in the bundle (provided that BEA indeed granted that licence in the first place, of course). Best wishes, Bruno. Jennifer Carlucci wrote: > > As part of clearing Restlet v1.4 through our legal team to include it in > our product, we did code scans of the javax.xml.stream package. The > license.txt shows that the bundle is licensed under CDDL, but the code > scans show that the source contains the BEA license. Does the CDDL > license that's found in the bundle override the BEA license that's found > in the source? > > Thanks, > Jennifer Carlucci > ------------------------------------------------------ http://restlet.tigris.org/ds/viewMessage.do?dsForumId=4447&dsMessageId=2371310
